Рус Eng Cn Перевести страницу на:  
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Библиотека
ваш профиль

Вернуться к содержанию

SENTENTIA. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences
Правильная ссылка на статью:

The cybernaut as a symbol of the global world

Гуревич Павел Семёнович

доктор философских наук, доктор филологических наук

главный научный сотрудник, Институт философии РАН

109240, Россия, г. Москва, ул. Гончарная, 12, стр. 1

Gurevich Pavel Semenovich

head of the division at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str. 1, of. -

gurevich@rambler.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/1339-3057.2014.2.12037

Дата направления статьи в редакцию:

16-07-2014


Дата публикации:

30-07-2014


Аннотация: The author discusses anthropological aspects of modern globalization. He shows that comprehension of global processes requires analysis of the problems of human nature. An attempt is made at creating a generalized image of man that will be a symbol of the nascent world. On the other hand, the author criticizes the projects of deanthropologization, debiologization of man. Traditional questions of philosophical anthropology, such as «is man a creator or a creation?», «who or what is the demiurge of the modern world?», «is the human body really a basis for human identification?», «is human nature capable of extreme openness and infinite transformation?», prove to be topical again. The author uses the method of philosophical anthropology to analyze these problems. He shows that this philosophical trend, for the decades of its existence, has improved its approaches to the issues of philosophical comprehension of man and is based on these original traditions. The novelty of the approach is not related only to restoration of the mystical tradition of remaking man but also to critical consideration of the whole European experience of «reconstruction» of the personality. The article evaluates the technical project of «remaking man» from critical positions, sets forth arguments that permit to rationally approach the problem and its basic foundations.


Ключевые слова:

global world, man, cybernaut, identity, transformation, nature, genetics, philosophy, philosophical anthropology, symbol

Библиография
1. Baudrillard, J., 2006. The trapsparency of Evil. М., Dobrosvet.
2. Berdyaev, N.A., 1989. Smysl tvorchestva [The meaning of the creative act]. In: Berdyaev, N.A., 1989. Filosofia svobody. Smysl tvorchestva [The philosophy of freedom. The meaning of the creative act]. М., Pravda.
3. Chardin, Pierre, 1987. Fenomen cheloveka [The phenomenon of man]. М., Nauka.
4. Dugin, A.G., 2007. Postgumanizm. Chelovek v mire postmoderna [Posthumanism. Man in the postmodern world]. Vestnik analitiki, 1: 132.
5. Gurevich, P.S., 2008. Logika biosa i mozg mashiny [The logic of bios and the machine brain]. Filosofia i kultura, 8: 28-36.
6. Jaspers, K., 1997. General psychopathology. М., Workshop.
7. Kutyrev, V.A., 2006. Filosofskiy obraz nashego vremeni [The philosophical image of our time (the lifeless worlds of posthumanity)]. Smolensk, Smolensk state University.
8. Kutyrev, V.A., 2009. Chelovecheskoe i inoe. Bor’ba mirov [The human and the other. The war of the world’s]. St.Petersburg, Aleteja.
9. Kutyrev, V.A., 2010. Bytie i nichto [Being and nothing]. St.Petersburg, Aleteja.
10. Kutyrev, V.A., 2010. Filosofia transgumanizma [The philosophy of transhumanism]. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod University.
11. Leary, T., 2002. The seven tongues of God. К., Janus, М., Peresvet.
12. Lektorskiy, V.A., 2004. Umer li chelovek [Is man dead]? In: Stepin, V.S. (edit.), 2004. Nauka, obshchestvo, chelovek. To the 75th anniversary of the birth of academician I.T. Frolov. М., Nauka.
13. Mirandola, Giovanni Pico della, 1981. Oration on the dignity of man. In: Shestakov, V.P. (comp.), 1981. Estetika Renessansa [Aesthetics of the Renaissance]. Vol. 1, p. 249.
14. Nietzsche, F., 1990. Ecce Homo. How one becomes what one is. In: Nietzsche, F., 1990. Works in two vols. М., Idea.
15. Peskov, V., 2008. Novoselye murashey [A new ant home]. Komsomolskaya pravda, 24-31 July: 65.
16. Samokhvalova, V.I., 2009. K ponimaniyu cheloveka v ego chelovecheskoy identichnosti [On understanding of man in his human identity]. Polignosis, 2: 89-102.
17. Savchenko, I.A., 2009. Transformatsiya kul’turnoy identichnosti v multikulturnom soobshchestve [Transformation of cultural identity in a multicultural community]. Lichnost. Kultura. Obshchestvo, 50: 430-438.
18. Smirnov, S.S., 2003. Sovremennaya antropologia [Modern anthropology. An analytical review]. Chelovek, 5.
19. Vdovina, I.S., 2008. Merleau-Ponty Maurice. In: Blauberg, I.I. (edit.), 2008. Filosofy Frantsii [French philosophers]. Dictionary, М.: Gardariki
References
1. Baudrillard, J., 2006. The trapsparency of Evil. M., Dobrosvet.
2. Berdyaev, N.A., 1989. Smysl tvorchestva [The meaning of the creative act]. In: Berdyaev, N.A., 1989. Filosofia svobody. Smysl tvorchestva [The philosophy of freedom. The meaning of the creative act]. M., Pravda.
3. Chardin, Pierre, 1987. Fenomen cheloveka [The phenomenon of man]. M., Nauka.
4. Dugin, A.G., 2007. Postgumanizm. Chelovek v mire postmoderna [Posthumanism. Man in the postmodern world]. Vestnik analitiki, 1: 132.
5. Gurevich, P.S., 2008. Logika biosa i mozg mashiny [The logic of bios and the machine brain]. Filosofia i kultura, 8: 28-36.
6. Jaspers, K., 1997. General psychopathology. M., Workshop.
7. Kutyrev, V.A., 2006. Filosofskiy obraz nashego vremeni [The philosophical image of our time (the lifeless worlds of posthumanity)]. Smolensk, Smolensk state University.
8. Kutyrev, V.A., 2009. Chelovecheskoe i inoe. Bor’ba mirov [The human and the other. The war of the world’s]. St.Petersburg, Aleteja.
9. Kutyrev, V.A., 2010. Bytie i nichto [Being and nothing]. St.Petersburg, Aleteja.
10. Kutyrev, V.A., 2010. Filosofia transgumanizma [The philosophy of transhumanism]. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod University.
11. Leary, T., 2002. The seven tongues of God. K., Janus, M., Peresvet.
12. Lektorskiy, V.A., 2004. Umer li chelovek [Is man dead]? In: Stepin, V.S. (edit.), 2004. Nauka, obshchestvo, chelovek. To the 75th anniversary of the birth of academician I.T. Frolov. M., Nauka.
13. Mirandola, Giovanni Pico della, 1981. Oration on the dignity of man. In: Shestakov, V.P. (comp.), 1981. Estetika Renessansa [Aesthetics of the Renaissance]. Vol. 1, p. 249.
14. Nietzsche, F., 1990. Ecce Homo. How one becomes what one is. In: Nietzsche, F., 1990. Works in two vols. M., Idea.
15. Peskov, V., 2008. Novoselye murashey [A new ant home]. Komsomolskaya pravda, 24-31 July: 65.
16. Samokhvalova, V.I., 2009. K ponimaniyu cheloveka v ego chelovecheskoy identichnosti [On understanding of man in his human identity]. Polignosis, 2: 89-102.
17. Savchenko, I.A., 2009. Transformatsiya kul’turnoy identichnosti v multikulturnom soobshchestve [Transformation of cultural identity in a multicultural community]. Lichnost. Kultura. Obshchestvo, 50: 430-438.
18. Smirnov, S.S., 2003. Sovremennaya antropologia [Modern anthropology. An analytical review]. Chelovek, 5.
19. Vdovina, I.S., 2008. Merleau-Ponty Maurice. In: Blauberg, I.I. (edit.), 2008. Filosofy Frantsii [French philosophers]. Dictionary, M.: Gardariki